Google Ordered to Pay $2 Billion For Anti-Competitive Practices By Swedish Court
4 83Google was ordered to pay almost $2 billion this week to Pricerunner, reports Bloomberg: The Patent and Market Court in Stockholm, which issued the judgment on Wednesday, dismissed most parts of the claim in which Pricerunner sought 80 billion Swedish kronor, or roughly $8.2 billion, in the wake of a European Union antitrust crackdown... The Swedish price-comparison website argued that Google has been abusing its dominant position as a search engine by favoring its own comparison shopping service over competing portals for more than a decade. Wednesday's award compensates for lost revenue caused by Google's preferential treatment of its own comparison-shopping service over independent price-comparison services, conduct that also drives up costs for consumers, [Pricerunner owner] Klarna said in a statement after the judgment...
A Google spokesperson said the company doesn't agree with the court's decision and will consider its legal options. [The ruling can be appealed.] Changes implemented in 2017 to Google's platform are working and generating growth and jobs for hundreds of comparison shopping services operating more than 1500 websites across Europe, according to the statement.
The litigation is linked to a 2017 decision by the European Commission to fine Google €2.4 billion for illegally leveraging its search dominance to give its own shopping service an edge. The EU decision unleashed a wave of so-called follow-on suits, which were delayed for years as Google appealed the EU fine. Two years ago the EU's top tribunal confirmed that the company did violate antitrust laws — meaning EU-based plaintiffs no longer have to prove that in court. A Berlin court last year ordered the tech giant to pay €573 million in damages to two German price-comparison websites, a ruling Google appealed. Similar cases are pending across Europe.
4 comments
Re:Joke's on them (Score: 5, Informative)
by GuB-42 ( 2483988 ) on Monday July 06, 2026 @07:50AM (#66224632)
It is. They have offices all over the world, including in Sweden. It gives them access to local businesses, but it also means that they are bound by local laws.
Re:Joke's on them (Score: 5, Insightful)
by AmiMoJo ( 196126 ) on Monday July 06, 2026 @12:24PM (#66225124)
This is actually a very important point, because an argument that local Google subsidiaries frequently use to try to get out of lawsuits is that they aren't the ones providing the service, and the litigant must instead sue their US parent company (not the Irish one for some strange reason). It is of course much harder and much more expensive to sue a US company, and to enforce any judgements.
EU courts don't fall for it. Structuring their international corporation to make suing them harder doesn't fly. Their local subsidiaries are substantial and considered to be representatives of the parent corporation, for the purposes of legal challenge.
Re:Kinda Funny (Score: 5, Insightful)
by r1348 ( 2567295 ) on Monday July 06, 2026 @08:54AM (#66224710)
No, we simply still enforce laws, including competition ones.
On the other side, it looks like in the US you just decided to hand them over the control of your country.
Re:Kinda Funny (Score: 5, Insightful)
by _merlin ( 160982 ) on Monday July 06, 2026 @09:34AM (#66224774)
It isn't a fine. They're being sued for damages. The money goes to the litigant, not to "Sweden". If Google want to avoid constantly paying damages, they should consider not constantly doing illegal things. It's ironic that you're accusing Europeans of wanting to be anti-competitive when this whole thing is about (American) Google's anti-competitive practices.