IBM Says It Can Fit Nearly 100 Billion Transistors On a Chip
7 111IBM has unveiled "what it says is the world's first sub-1-nanometer chip technology," reports ZDNet, "designed to pack nearly 100 billion transistors on a fingernail-size die, roughly doubling the density of IBM's earlier 2-nm test chip, first shown in 2021... Today, the smallest, most powerful chips top out at about 80 billion transistors." At the heart of the announcement is NanoStack. This is a three-dimensional, nanosheet-based transistor design that scales vertically, or along the z-axis, by stacking and staggering CMOS devices. Unlike today's nanosheet architectures, which IBM also pioneered and which are being adopted by leading foundries at 3 nm and 2 nm, NanoStack bonds two nanosheet transistors into a single vertical structure, with each tier optimized independently and contacted from opposite sides. Each transistor in the demonstrated structure uses three sub-5 nm-thick nanosheets, about "15 silicon atoms" across, separated by roughly 9 nm spacers. Two such devices are then bonded vertically using an ultra-thin dielectric process IBM describes as a key innovation. Because the top and bottom devices can use different channel materials, dielectrics, and metals, IBM argues NanoStack is less a single trick and more a transistor platform that can be extended through multiple generations: 7 angstrom (Å), 5 Å, 3 Å, and potentially down to 1 Å in its internal roadmap.
An angstrom, by the by, is one ten-billionth of a meter. In terms of chips, an angstrom is a tenth of a nanometer. "This is the world's first sub-1 nanometer chip technology with a new transistor architecture," said Jay Gambetta, Director of IBM Research and IBM Fellow, during a press briefing. "We're not just making smaller transistors, we're reinventing how chips are built to deliver dramatically more power and energy efficiency...." Based on internal benchmarking against its 2 nm node, the company said its new chips will deliver up to 50% higher performance at the same power, or up to 70% lower power for the same performance. Big Blue also highlighted a 40% improvement in the scaling of static random-access memory (SRAM) cell area relative to its 2 nm technology.
This is a change IBM described as a "step the industry hasn't seen in over a decade" and one that could be particularly important for AI accelerators that live or die on on-chip memory bandwidth... According to Huiming Bu, IBM's VP of silicon technology R&D, NanoStack is a new paradigm. It's moving chips to scaling fully into three dimensions and giving the industry at least "another decade" of logic advances as it crosses from nanometers into angstroms... The 40% SRAM density bump could also help architects push caches and on-die memory closer to compute units, cutting data movement overhead in training and inference workloads.
IBM sees a path to production use "in as early as the next 5 years", according to the article, and "expects NanoStack to eventually underpin CPUs, GPUs, mobile SoCs, and SRAM arrays."
IBM's VP of silicon technology R&D says the new innovation "can improve performance by 50% compared to the best available chip today, and at the same time can reduce power by 70%."
7 comments
Re:Wow! (Score: 5, Funny)
by bill_mcgonigle ( 4333 ) * ) on Monday June 29, 2026 @04:51PM (#66215982)
Interestingly enough if you count out loud your lips won't touch in the middle until you get to a million.
Billion continues that deviation from the lower numbers.
Amazing if it works (Score: 5, Insightful)
by DeanonymizedCoward ( 7230266 ) on Monday June 29, 2026 @10:50AM (#66215516)
While I like to come here and rant about stupidity and enshittification, this story gives me a moment to reflect on the amazing achievements we've made as a species. We long ago blew through the wavelengths of visible light, and are now encroaching on X-rays and approaching the sizes of some of the larger atoms with manufactured, active structures. Impressive.
Re:Amazing if it works (Score: 5, Insightful)
by silvergig ( 7651900 ) on Monday June 29, 2026 @12:39PM (#66215642)
We're an amazing species and everyone needs to remember that now and then.
Yes, amazing how after all the improvements we made on technology we're still waging wars, oppress, steal, believe fantasy characters are real, are selfishly raiding and polluting our only home at the cost of other living beings.
We haven't improved as a species, we only modernised.
SOME people are waging wars, oppressing, stealing, destroying. I don't believe fantasy characters are real, I don't wage wars. I am trying to not destroy the earth. I thought about modding this shitpost down, but I'd like to point out that it's jerky comments like this that keep everyone divided. Not everyone is perfect, just like not everyone is an asshole.
Re:Amazing if it works (Score: 5, Informative)
by swillden ( 191260 ) on <shawn-ds@willden.org> on Monday June 29, 2026 @01:09PM (#66215702)
We're an amazing species and everyone needs to remember that now and then.
Yes, amazing how after all the improvements we made on technology we're still waging wars, oppress, steal, believe fantasy characters are real, are selfishly raiding and polluting our only home at the cost of other living beings.
We haven't improved as a species, we only modernised.
SOME people are waging wars, oppressing, stealing, destroying. I don't believe fantasy characters are real, I don't wage wars. I am trying to not destroy the earth. I thought about modding this shitpost down, but I'd like to point out that it's jerky comments like this that keep everyone divided. Not everyone is perfect, just like not everyone is an asshole.
And it's also worth remembering that we wage far less war than ever before, and engage in far less of the rest as well. Stephen Pinker's "The Better Angels of Our Nature" documents this very well and I highly recommend it.
Just consider one example: Animal cruelty. Of course some people are still quite cruel to animals, but they're the exception, and this was not historically the case. For example there are historical accounts of a common festival entertainment in medieval France, where cats were put in sacks or baskets or hung from poles and burned alive so their yowling could amuse crowds of festival-goers. Bear-baiting, bull-baiting and cockfighting were other examples. These weren't underground, deviant activities, they were public, family events that whole communities anticipated and attended with great enjoyment.
We're far from perfect, but we're getting better, and not just technologically.
Using Z (Score: 5, Informative)
by symbolset ( 646467 ) * ) on Monday June 29, 2026 @10:54AM (#66215522)
The angstrom scale business is marketing fluff to make the density increase understandable to consumers. But this is one of the developments leveraging the Z dimension that are legitimate progress. The Z dimension gives more than just the same chip folded like origami. The net distance traveled by a signal in a cycle can be reduced, which yields massive improvement in performance without additional cost of power/heat.
Re:IBM has been making big promises (Score: 5, Interesting)
by Tailhook ( 98486 ) on Monday June 29, 2026 @01:08PM (#66215700)
But what has IBM actually delivered in any of these areas in recent years?
A great deal. IBM licenses, partners and consults with semiconductor manufacturers globally, and runs a thriving IP business from their huge R&D facility in Albany, NY. Samsung, Rapidus, AMD, ST, SMIC and others are all paying for IBM tech in recent deals. GlobalFoundries bought out IBM Microelectronics for IBM's 300mm tech. IBM is among the most prolific patent filers in the world.
The real story here is this: ASML has a new machine for a new process node. ASML is obligated to perform much of their R&D in the US due to strict export and technology sharing agreements with the US government. IBM operates huge, world class R&D lab in Albany, heavily subsidized by the state and US government. The new process that this story is about is really IBM working as an R&D partner with ASML to refine the process and get it ready for commercial operation.
In a few years, when they get the yields to something plausible, ASML customers will buy the new machines, and IBM will be in the room, taking their cut for IP, consulting, support etc.
Um, what? (Score: 5, Interesting)
by CEC-P ( 10248912 ) on Monday June 29, 2026 @12:28PM (#66215634)
IBM sold off its semiconductor business in 2014 and does not produce any chips themselves of any kind at all. They don't even make their own qubits. What they likely meant to say was that TSMC found a way to make 1nk chips or whatever ridiculous claim they're making that almost definitely isn't true.