'Supergirl' Movie Criticized for Script, Poor Visual Effects
7 170The Onion joked the new movie Supergirl is about a hero who must single-handedly save the world "after the catastrophic collapse of interest in the genre."
Unfortunately, The Hollywood Reporter says the film's reviews "range from negative to tepid praise (averaging a 58 percent Rotten Tomatoes score)." Many point fingers at the film's script, with Variety's line — "a comic-book movie with the worst script I can remember" — going viral... Not to pile on, but there's another recurring gripe from the reviews that stood out: Critics bashed the film as being murky, dark and gray, with poor VFX: "Muddy CG sludge" wrote one. Another said the film was full of "sludgy browns and grays" and "the visual murkiness of the settings makes it hard to follow the already unintelligible action sequences." A third wrote the "VFX is so rough it makes The Flash look like Avatar." Moviegoers increasingly despise murky, dark visuals (often used to hide weak effects), along with obvious CGI and incoherent action. They've seen it so many times they've become allergic.
The Bulwark agrees that the action sequences are "terribly lit, incoherently staged, and just generally weightless and ugly... [I]t's reminiscent of the disaster that was The Flash: It's just very obvious during certain sequences that everyone was in a big green-screen warehouse and the camera was whipping around with the knowledge that everything would be painted in later, so who really gives a crap how anything looks on the day of."
But they also call the movie "a tremendous slog of a film, a real step backwards for the James Gunn-overseen DC Universe of movies and TV shows" that's "neither fun nor exciting" and "feels empty." The film does have one bright spot: Lobo, who is played by Jason Momoa as something like Michael Keaton's Beetlejuice by way of Jason Momoa's Aquaman. He's blustery and cantankerous and saucy and just a little menacing; it's a perfect piece of casting and a really nice performance. Unfortunately, it's the only spark of life in what is otherwise a deeply dour, deeply boring piece of filmmaking... Supergirl is just a misfire on nearly every level, one that lacks the sincerity and fun of last year's reboot of this universe or the comic pathos present in Gunn's Peacemaker series on HBO Max.
Reason calls it "dark, depressive, and dull" and "a downer of a movie in nearly every way." It's not fun. It's barely even righteous. It's just miserable. At one point, Supergirl flat-out murders a guy by pushing a giant sword through his neck. Somehow, I suspect even Zack Snyder would be appalled.
Time argued fans of last decade's superhero movies "should be demanding more, not less." Though "Will there be rioting in the streets once audiences get some idea of how lousy Supergirl is? Probably not."
7 comments
Second Movie In a Row Saving a Dog (Score: 5, Interesting)
by XopherMV ( 575514 ) on Sunday June 28, 2026 @12:14PM (#66214148)
I like Krypto. However, this is the second movie in a row where he features as a key part of the plot. Like, find something else to drive the story. Please. Let the dog be an interesting side character.
Supergirl’s plot involves getting a poison antidote hanging around an evil character’s neck. She fights this evil character multiple times and could take the antidote at any point. Of course, she doesn’t because that’d be the end of the movie. The end result is that this plot point gets dragged out for no particular reason.
Other points make no sense. There’s only 2 Kryptonians left. But, evidently they’re so well known across the galaxy that everyone knows their weaknesses.
Why is this of interest here? (Score: 5, Insightful)
by LainTouko ( 926420 ) on Sunday June 28, 2026 @12:16PM (#66214152)
I generally expect the Slashdot audience to mostly have working brains, so why is "here is a thing which was in comics many decades ago. This makes it automatically interesting!" such an effective marketing ploy here? Shouldn't we be looking for new and interesting ideas generated by the world of the 2020s rather than the world of the 19-whatever-it-is?
Though it's part of a general degradation in science fiction. Take robots, for example. Originally, there were stories with robots in because people were trying to imagine the future and wondered if we'd make robots to do things, obviously something for technically-minded intelligent people to be interested in. Now there are stories with robots in because they're an expected sci-fi/fantasy thing, like magic or superheroes. We need to get back to honestly speculating what the world might look like in 100 years time. Maybe the problem is that the answers look bad.
Did y'all watch the same movie? (Score: 5, Interesting)
by OS24Ever ( 245667 ) on <trekkie@nomorestars.com> on Sunday June 28, 2026 @03:09PM (#66214410)
I went to it last night. I have no idea what the complaints are about. 'Dark and Muddy' we were on a world destroyed by war, with people scrounging out an existnance that had bad guys stealing every female child for a breeding farm. Should it be bright and clean?
way to blow the ending spoiler. Yes, she killed a guy. how many action movies have been released where the body count is 100x higher and we're cool with it? the hero murders entire base full of people blows it up on the way out, but supergirl stabs a guy who shot her dog with a poison that tortures it to death over three days and killed a kids family, killed another family and their kid in front of her.
He died to quickly for my taste. He needed to die screaming, one appendage ripped off at a time.
it was a fun movie, I swear to god I do not understand people these days.
Re:Let me guess (Score: 5, Insightful)
by jhoegl ( 638955 ) on Sunday June 28, 2026 @01:21PM (#66214278)
So, when you link an article of women graduating more, that is somehow an agenda?
Yeah... I am woke, because my eyes are wide open.
Keep yours closed, Im sure it will work out for you, especially in education.
Lame, Lazy criticism - the only agenda is $$ (Score: 5, Insightful)
by Somervillain ( 4719341 ) on Sunday June 28, 2026 @12:09PM (#66214136)
another DEI/SJW film, and the people involved are baffled about why it failed?
Kewl argument from 10 years ago, bro. Which wasn't even relevant back when you thought it was...it just wasn't so obvious how wrong you are. Studios are sociopaths with no agenda beyond making money. They don't care about DEI or social justice. Anything you consider "woke" that was put out by a major studio was an investment to get a new market, nothing more. Those fuckers gladly rolled over for Trump when he came into town. They quickly abandoned any perspective that didn't deliver a return on investment.
They thought socially conscious youth were a potential market to make money...once they saw that the "woke" mob you talk about was only a handful of psychos on Twitter, they realized there was not zeitgeist. There was no coming revolution or untapped market. They weren't the tip of the spear speaking for a large quieter group of masses...they were just narcissistic blowhards....like you!
Also, for every "woke" movie you complain about for putting a female protagonist in it...there were 20 "gun porn" action movies released that are NRA propaganda..."one determined badass with a lot of cool guns will right what's wrong....on his own terms....all by himself". That's as fucking Republican as it gets: narcissistic-grade Individualism, chosen-one complex, "society and our institutions has failed to deliver justice, so I will take matters into my own hands". How many fucking movies have you seen like that?
Have you ever stopped to think how right wing they are? And regardless...John Wick is GOP propaganda...but I will still watch it because I was entertained. Every Rambo-rip-off is GOP propaganda. I'm not saying don't watch it...just understand that if your movie is some loner with a bunch of ammunition correcting the failing of impotent institutions...especially when their sin was giving criminals due process or respecting civil rights of the innocent....you're watching Right Wing propaganda.
And while I haven't seen the movie, every review I've read, including the ones in this article don't mention politics or "an agenda"...but simply the story underwhelmed and the visuals sucked. One review said it was very simple, retro 90s superhero movie throwback...which I kinda miss...but yeah...if you're used to fun colorful movies like Superman or Fantastic 4....I can see why you'd be disappointed. Most of us don't take comic books seriously. We tolerate them because they're fun spectacles, but most of the stories are STUPID....really STUPID. They're perfect for a making cool drawings for young boys 40-60 years ago when they were written...but MOST of the comic book stories don't hold up well on the big screen.
No one stops to think how absurd these stories are. No one would write a movie today with the majority of these stories. It was really an anomaly that Marvel made so much money off the MCU. It was very neat that they did and I had a great time, but only because I was so entertained, I didn't stop to think how stupid all the stories were. If you don't make your movie sufficiently entertaining....then the weak premise and lackluster script really bring it down.
Re:Lame, Lazy criticism - the only agenda is $$ (Score: 5, Insightful)
by serviscope_minor ( 664417 ) on Monday June 29, 2026 @01:00PM (#66215678)
When an unqualified woman writes a bad script that doesn't get shit canned in pre-production,
Absolute unmitigated bullshit.
And yet when the poorly qualified Josh Trank and Jeremey Slater contributed to the absolute stinker of fantastic 4, noone shat themselves screeching about DEI.
That's because all the DEI whiners are a bunch of unmitigated hypocrites.
Re:Lame, Lazy criticism - the only agenda is $$ (Score: 5, Insightful)
by AmiMoJo ( 196126 ) on Monday June 29, 2026 @09:33AM (#66215392)
See, this is what I'm talking about. You can invent reasons why it all makes sense. Some fans enjoy that, it's fine. But if you are willing to do it to explain away Luke's meteoric rise, why not Rey's as well? Remember that most of this stuff to justify Luke is based on stuff from the books and other media, or from what amount to retcons in later movies.
Also are we all still pretending that the Holiday Special didn't happen and isn't canon?