Earth is Warming Faster Than Ever. But Why?
6 111"Global temperatures have been rising for decades," reports the Washington Post. "But many scientists say it's now happening faster than ever before." According to a Washington Post analysis, the fastest warming rate on record occurred in the last 30 years. The Post used a dataset from NASA to analyze global average surface temperatures from 1880 to 2025. "We're not continuing on the same path we had before," said Robert Rohde, chief scientist at Berkeley Earth. "Something has changed...." Temperatures over the past decade have increased by close to 0.27 degrees C per decade — about a 42 percent increase...
For decades, a portion of the warming unleashed by greenhouse gas emissions was "masked" by sulfate aerosols. These tiny particles cause heart and lung disease when people inhale polluted air, but they also deflect the sun's rays. Over the entire planet, those aerosols can create a significant cooling effect — scientists estimate that they have canceled out about half a degree Celsius of warming so far. But beginning about two decades ago, countries began cracking down on aerosol pollution, particularly sulfate aerosols. Countries also began shifting from coal and oil to wind and solar power. As a result, global sulfur dioxide emissions have fallen about 40 percent since the mid-2000s; China's emissions have fallen even more. That effect has been compounded in recent years by a new international regulation that slashed sulfur emissions from ships by about 85 percent.
That explains part of why warming has kicked up a bit. But some researchers say that the last few years of record heat can't be explained by aerosols and natural variability alone. In a paper published in the journal Science in late 2024, researchers argued that about 0.2 degrees C of 2023's record heat — or about 13 percent — couldn't be explained by aerosols and other factors. Instead, they found that the planet's low-lying cloud cover had decreased — and because low-lying clouds tend to reflect the sun's rays, that decrease warmed the planet... That shift in cloud cover could also be partly related to aerosols, since clouds tend to form around particles in the atmosphere. But some researchers also say it could be a feedback loop from warming temperatures. If temperatures warm, it can be harder for low-lying clouds to form.
If most of the current record warmth is due to changing amounts of aerosol pollution, the acceleration would stop once aerosol pollutants reach zero — and the planet would return to its previous, slower rate of warming. But if it's due to a cloud feedback loop, the acceleration is likely to continue — and bring with it worsening heat waves, storms and droughts.
"Scientists thought they understood global warming," reads the Post's original headline. "Then the past three years happened."
Just last month Nuuk, Greenland saw temperatures over 20 degrees Fahrenheit above average, their article points out. And "Parts of Australia, meanwhile, have seen temperatures push past 120 degrees Fahrenheit amid a record heat wave..."
6 comments
It's not about short-term profit (Score: 5, Insightful)
by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Saturday February 14, 2026 @08:31PM (#65989632)
It's about power. We are going to transition to solar power and the current owners of all the oil are intentionally slowing that transition down so that they can make sure they are the ones who own all the capital and infrastructure and get all of the money generated by it.
Common Sense dictates that we just have publicly owned solar power since it's literally going to be a universally desired service that has little or no cost beyond the original setup and then some maintenance and recycling.
But we threw common Sense out the window decades ago when we decided to go all in on reaganism and thatcherism. Or whatever your local equivalent is to pseudocapitalism.
So instead banks will loan billions and billions of dollars to private individuals so that they own the infrastructure needed for electricity and get to decide where that electricity goes while profiting from it and I suspect they will just default on the loans and we will all get stuck bailing out those two big to fail Banks like we always do.
Socialize the losses privatize the profits
How odd (Score: 5, Informative)
by ArchieBunker ( 132337 ) on Saturday February 14, 2026 @01:58PM (#65989052)
Almost like scientists were saying there was a tipping point when global temperatures would start climbing. Here’s a handy graph for republicans. https://xkcd.com/1732/ [xkcd.com]
Re: How odd (Score: 5, Insightful)
by Tomahawk ( 1343 ) on Saturday February 14, 2026 @02:55PM (#65989148)
So science, not "Sciencism" or whatever, tells us that climate change is happening, and it's going to be really really bad.
That's the point you're agreeing with, yes? Real actual science done with real actual data that shows us the real actual detrimental impact that humans are causing to our planet's climate.
I agree. Real science for the win.
It's just a pity the politicians and many on the far right disagree with us.
But they don't understand real science. They understand money. Money before everything.
Which is a pity.
But, yeah, I agree -- real science shows climate change is happening and is going to destroy the planet. And I'm glad you agree too.
Re:How odd (Score: 5, Insightful)
by cpurdy ( 4838085 ) on Saturday February 14, 2026 @03:38PM (#65989202)
What does this have to do with left vs right? Liberal vs conservative? Straight vs gay? Trans vs ... I dunno, whatever not trans is.
The climate does not give a fuck about your politics, or your party affiliation, or your gender, or your pronouns, or whatever.
Neither does science. Or math.
If you think that making the world a less healthful and less livable place is a great idea, then there's simply something wrong with you. That's not being "conservative"; that's just being an ignorant cultist.
The EPA was created by conservatives. Our national park system was created by conservatives. Conservatives conserve.
You're not a conservative. And despite your chosen name here, your post is one of the most ignorant and idiotic that I've encountered today, which is really saying something.
monkeys boutta die out (meaning you) (Score: 5, Interesting)
by invisiblefireball ( 10371234 ) on Saturday February 14, 2026 @02:18PM (#65989080)
How conveniently we forget.
The whole and only point of not hitting +2 degrees was to avoid the runaway processes beyond which we could not predict what would happen from our position of ignorance.
Yes the world's climate is always changing. It does so through some obvious and predictable mechanisms, and some others less obvious. All we knew was the probability of runaway process we did not understand got unacceptably high if we hit +2 through the CO2 mechanism.
We all know how that played out - the stupid won.
Flap your jaws if you want, they never mattered anyway
Positive feedback loop (Score: 5, Insightful)
by dskoll ( 99328 ) on Saturday February 14, 2026 @02:32PM (#65989108)
It's called a positive feedback loop. And it will be way more annoying that a squeal from a speaker too close to a mic.